气候变化背景下中国滑坡灾害人口风险评估

doi:10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2021.154

气候变化研究进展 ›› 2022, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 166-176.doi: 10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2021.154

气候变化背景下中国滑坡灾害人口风险评估

王霞¹^,²(), 王瑛¹^,²(), 林齐根³, 李宁¹^,², 张馨仁¹^,², 周笑影¹^,²

1 北京师范大学环境演变与自然灾害教育部重点实验室,北京 100875
2 应急管理部-教育部减灾与应急管理研究院,北京 100875
3 南京信息工程大学地理科学学院/灾害风险管理研究院,南京 210044

收稿日期:2021-08-04 修回日期:2021-10-03 出版日期:2022-03-30 发布日期:2021-12-28
通讯作者: 王瑛
作者简介:王霞,女,博士研究生, wxia@mail.bnu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究(2019QZKK0906);第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究(2019QZKK0606)

Projection of China landslide disasters population risk under climate change

WANG Xia¹^,²(), WANG Ying¹^,²(), LIN Qi-Gen³, LI Ning¹^,², ZHANG Xin-Ren¹^,², ZHOU Xiao-Ying¹^,²

1 Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2 Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Ministry of Emergency Management and Ministry of Education, Beijing 100875, China
3 Institute for Disaster Risk Management/School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

Received:2021-08-04 Revised:2021-10-03 Online:2022-03-30 Published:2021-12-28
Contact: WANG Ying

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

中国是世界上滑坡灾害造成人口伤亡较严重的国家。受气候变化影响,极端降水频率与强度的增加会提高滑坡灾害的人口风险。文中将不同RCPs情景多个模式的未来降水数据和SSPs情景下的未来人口数据相结合,构建滑坡灾害人口风险评估模型,评估气候变化背景下的中国滑坡灾害人口风险。研究发现,气候变化下中国滑坡灾害的危险性呈上升趋势,预估21世纪中期（2031—2060年）RCP4.5和RCP8.5情景下中国滑坡灾害高危险区面积相较于基准时期（1970—2000年）将分别增长5.5%和7.9%。其中,青藏高原地区增长最为显著。中国未来滑坡灾害的人口风险呈现先增长后下降的趋势,RCP8.5/SSP3情景较RCP4.5/SSP2情景上升更多,预计21世纪中期滑坡灾害年均伤亡人口将由基准时期的639人增加至956人;21世纪末期（2071—2100年),由于滑坡灾害暴露人口下降,年均伤亡人口将减至737人。未来浙江、广东、四川、云南和西藏省始终是滑坡灾害伤亡人口最高的省份,需加大防范措施,降低滑坡灾害人口风险。

关键词: 气候变化, 极端降水, 滑坡灾害, 人口风险, 中国

Abstract:

China is a country in the world where landslides disasters have caused serious casualties. Due to the impact of climate change, the occurrence of extreme precipitation frequency and intensity is projected to be on the rise, which will increase the population risk of landslide disasters. This paper coupled the future precipitation data of multiple models in different RCPs scenarios and the population data in SSPs scenario into an established landslides risk model to quantitatively assess the projected changes in China landslides population risk. The results showed that compared with the baseline period (1970-2000), the high-landslide-hazard zones is projected to increase by 5.5% and 7.9%, respectively under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios in the middle 21st century (2031-2060). The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau has the most significant growth. The population risk of landslides disasters in China shows increasing trend and then decreases under the RCPs-SSPs scenarios. Compared with the RCP4.5/SSP2, the average annually casualty of landslide disasters will increase from 639 to 956 under the RCP8.5/SSP3 in the middle 21st century. In the end of the 21st century (2071-2100), due to the decline of exposure population, the average annual casualties of landslide disasters will decrease to 737. In the future, Zhejiang, Guangdong, Sichuan, Yunnan, and Tibet will always be the provinces with the highest casualties of landslides disaster. Therefore, it is necessary to increase risk prevention measures to reduce the population risk of landslides disaster.

Key words: Climate change, Extreme precipitation, Landslides disaster, Population risk, China

王霞, 王瑛, 林齐根, 李宁, 张馨仁, 周笑影. 气候变化背景下中国滑坡灾害人口风险评估[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2022, 18(2): 166-176.

WANG Xia, WANG Ying, LIN Qi-Gen, LI Ning, ZHANG Xin-Ren, ZHOU Xiao-Ying. Projection of China landslide disasters population risk under climate change[J]. Climate Change Research, 2022, 18(2): 166-176.

图/表 10

表1 主要数据来源

Table 1 Main data sources

表2 本文选取的12个气候模式基本信息

Table 2 Basic information of 12 climate models used in this study

图1 气候变化情景下中国滑坡灾害人口风险评估流程图

Fig. 1 Flow chart of population risk assessment of landslides disasters in China under climate change scenarios

表3 3种降水数据集对比分析

Table 3 Comparative analysis of three precipitation data sets

图2 气候变化情景下中国滑坡危险性空间分布（多模式集合平均）(a)基准时期（1970—2000年）,(b) RCP8.5情景（2071—2100年）

Fig. 2 Spatial distribution of landslides hazards in China under climate change scenario. (a) Baseline period (1970-2000), (b) RCP8.5 (2071-2100)

图3 RCP8.5情景下21世纪末期相较于基准时期滑坡危险性变化空间分布（多模式集合平均）(a)中国;(b)广东省;(c)山西省;(d)西藏自治区

Fig. 3 Spatial distribution of changes in landslides hazard levels at the end of the 21st century compared to the baseline period under the RCP8.5 scenario (multi-model ensemble average). (a) China, (b) Guangdong province, (c) Shanxi province, (d) Tibet

图4 1950—2018年各省滑坡灾害年均伤亡人口(a)和滑坡灾害年均人口脆弱性指数(b)

Fig. 4 The average annual casualties (a) and the average annual population vulnerability index (b) of landslides disasters in various provinces during 1950-2018

图5 气候变化情景下中国滑坡灾害年均伤亡人口注：图中实线为多模式模拟结果集合平均;阴影范围的上下限分别为多模式模拟的伤亡人口最高值和最低值。

Fig. 5 The average annual casualties of landslides disasters under climate change scenarios. (Solid line: ensemble average casualties of multi-models; upper and lower limits of shadow range: maximum and minimum casualties of multi-models)

图6 气候变化情景下中国滑坡灾害年均伤亡人口占全国90%的省份（多模式集合平均）(a) RCP4.5/SSP2情景;(b) RCP8.5/SSP3情景

Fig. 6 Provinces in China with 90% of annual average casualties of landslides under RCP4.5/SSP2 scenario (a) and RCP8.5/SSP3 scenario (b)

图7 21世纪末期各省滑坡灾害年均伤亡人口变化（RCP4.5/SSP2情景）

Fig. 7 Changes in the annual average casualties of landslides disasters in various provinces at the end of the 21st century (RCP4.5/SSP2 scenario)

参考文献 35

[1]	Stanley T, Kirschbaum D, Zhou Y. Spatial and temporal analysis of a global landslide catalog[J]. Geomorphology, 2015, 249(15):4-15 doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.03.016 URL
[2]	Froude M J, Petley D N. Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2018, 18:2161-2181
[3]	Diffenbaugh N S, Field C. Changes in ecologically critical terrestrial climate conditions[J]. Science, 2013, 341(6145):486-492 doi: 10.1126/science.1237123 pmid: 23908225
[4]	IPCC. Climate change 2014: synthesis report [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014: 151
[5]	Kharin V V, Zwiers F W, Zhang X, et al. Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble[J]. Climatic Change, 2013, 119:345-357 doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0705-8 URL
[6]	Westra S, Fowler H J, Evans J P, et al. Future changes to the intensity and frequency of short-duration extreme rainfall[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 2014, 52:52-555
[7]	Gariano S L, Guzzetti F. Landslides in a changing climate[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2016, 162:227-252 doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.08.011 URL
[8]	Lin Q, Wang Y, Glade T,, et al. Assessing the spatiotemporal impact of climate change on event rainfall characteristics influencing landslide occurrences based on multiple GCM projections in China[J]. Climatic Change, 2020 (11):162, 761-779
[9]	Kirschbaum D, Kapnick S B, Stanley T, et al. Changes in extreme precipitation and landslides over high mountain Asia[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2020, 47(4):1-9
[10]	Gariano S L, Rianna G, Petrucci O, et al. Assessing future changes in the occurrence of rainfall-induced landslides at a regional scale[J]. The Science of The Total Environment, 2017 (596-597):417-426
[11]	Lin Q, Ying W. Spatial and temporal analysis of a fatal landslide inventory in China from 1950 to 2016[J]. Landslides, 2018: 1-16
[12]	Hungr O, Leroueil S, Picarelli L. The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update[J]. Landslides, 2014, 11(2):167-194 doi: 10.1007/s10346-013-0436-y URL
[13]	支泽民, 陈琼, 张强, 等. 地理探测器在判别滑坡稳定性影响因素中的应用: 以西藏江达县为例[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2021, 32(2):19-26.
	Zhi Z M, Chen Q, Zhang Q, et al. Application of geographic detector in identifying influencing factors of landslide stability: a case study of the Jiangda county, Tibet[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2021, 32(2):19-26 (in Chinese)
[14]	熊俊楠, 朱吉龙, 苏鹏程, 等. 基于GIS与信息量模型的溪洛渡库区滑坡危险性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(3):700-711.
	Xiong J N, Zhu J L, Su P C, et al. Risk assessment of landslide in the Xiluodu reservoir area based on GIS and information value method[J]. Resources and Environment in The Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(3):700-711 (in Chinese)
[15]	王瑛, 林齐根, 史培军. 中国地质灾害伤亡事件的空间格局及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(5):906-917. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201705011
	Wang Y, Lin Q G, Shi P J. Spatial pattern and influencing factors of casualty events caused by landslides[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(5):906-917 (in Chinese)
[16]	陈晓晨, 徐影, 许崇海. CMIP5全球气候模式对中国地区降水模拟能力的评估[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2014, 10(3):217-225.
	Chen X C, Xu Y, Xu C H. Assessment of precipitation simulations in China by CMIP5 multi-models[J]. Climate Change Research, 2014, 10(3):217-225 (in Chinese)
[17]	刘星才, 汤秋鸿, 尹圆圆. 气候变化下中国未来综合环境风险区划研究[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(4):636-644. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.04.018
	Liu X C, Tang Q H, Yin Y Y. Regionalization of integrated environmental risk of China under future climate change[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(4):636-644 (in Chinese)
[18]	张奇谋, 王润, 姜彤, 等. RCPs情景下汉江流域未来极端降水的模拟与预估[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(3):276-286.
	Zhang Q M, Wang R, Jiang T, et al. Projection of extreme precipitation in the Hanjiang River basin under different RCP scenarios[J]. Climate Change Research, 2020, 16(3):276-286 (in Chinese)
[19]	Yue Z, Ying W, Yu C, et al. Projection of changes in flash flood occurrence under climate change at tourist attractions[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 595:1-11
[20]	Willmott C J, Feddema J J. A more rational climatic moisture index[J]. The Professional Geographer, 1992, 44(1):84-88 doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1992.00084.x URL
[21]	翁宇威, 蔡闻佳, 王灿. 共享社会经济路径(SSPs)的应用与展望[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(2):215-222.
	Weng Y W, Cai W J, Wang C. The application and future directions of the shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs)[J]. Climate Change Research, 2020, 16(2):215-222 (in Chinese)
[22]	Murakami D, Yamagata Y. Estimation of gridded population and GDP scenarios with spatially explicit statistical downscaling[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11:2106 doi: 10.3390/su11072106 URL
[23]	Yu J L, Jie C, Tao P, Global socioeconomic risk of precipitation extremes under climate change[J]. Earth's Future, 2020, 8(9):1-15
[24]	Nadim F, Kjekstad O, Peduzzi P, et al. Global landslide and avalanche hotspots[J]. Landslides, 2006, 3(2):159-173 doi: 10.1007/s10346-006-0036-1 URL
[25]	Jaedicke C, Eeckhaut M, Nadim F, et al. Identification of landslide hazard and risk ‘hotspots' in Europe[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology & The Environment, 2014, 73(2):325-339
[26]	Lin L, Lin Q, Wang Y. Landslide susceptibility mapping on a global scale using the method of logistic regression[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2017, 17(8):1411-1424
[27]	吴佳, 高学杰. 一套格点化的中国区域逐日观测资料及与其它资料的对比[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(4):1102-1111.
	Wu J, Gao X J. A gridded daily observation dataset over China region and comparison with the other datasets[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(4):1102-1111 (in Chinese)
[28]	潘旸, 谷军霞, 宇婧婧, 等. 中国区域高分辨率多源降水观测产品的融合方法试验[J]. 气象学报, 2018, 76(5):755-766.
	Pan Y, Gu J X, Yu J J, et al. Test of merging methods for multi-source observed precipitation products at high resolution over China[J]. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 2018, 76(5):755-766 (in Chinese)
[29]	沈艳, 潘旸, 宇婧婧, 等. 中国区域小时降水量融合产品的质量评估[J]. 大气科学学报, 2013, 36(1):37-46.
	Shen Y, Pan Y, Yu J J, et al. Quality assessment of hourly merged precipitation product over China[J]. Transactions of Atmospheric Sciences, 2013, 36(1):37-46 (in Chinese)
[30]	Liu X L, Miao C. Large-scale assessment of landslide hazard, vulnerability and risk in China[J]. Geomatics Natural Hazards and Risk, 2018, 9(1):1037-1052 doi: 10.1080/19475705.2018.1502690 URL
[31]	San Diego C A, O'Neill B C, Kriegler E, et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways[J]. Climatic Change, 2014, 122:401-414 doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0971-5 URL
[32]	Villani V, Rianna G, Mercogliano P, et al. Statistical approaches versus weather generator to downscale RCM outputs to slope scale for stability assessment: a comparison of performances[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2015, 20:1495-1515
[33]	Melchiorre C, Frattini P. Modelling probability of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in a changing climate, Otta, Central Norway[J]. Climatic Change, 2012, 113:413-436 doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0325-0 URL
[34]	陶云, 唐川. 人类活动和降水变化对滑坡泥石流中长期演变的影响[J]. 高原气象, 2012, 31(5):1454-1460.
	Tao Y, Tang C. Influence of human activity and precipitation change on middle-long term evolution of landslide and debris flow disasters[J]. Plateau Meteorology, 2012, 31(5):1454-1460 (in Chinese)
[35]	Depicker A, Jacobs L, Mboga N, et al. Historical dynamics of landslide risk from population and forest-cover changes in the Kivu Rift[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2021, 9:445

气候变化背景下中国滑坡灾害人口风险评估

Projection of China landslide disasters population risk under climate change

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 35

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李莹, 赵珊珊. 2001—2020年中国洪涝灾害损失与致灾危险性研究[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2022, 18(2): 154-165.
[2]	华莉娟, 俞永强. 海洋环流的长期变化和预估[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2022, 18(1): 19-30.
[3]	孙晨, 汪方, 周月华, 李兰. CWRF模式对长江流域极端降水气候事件的模拟能力评估[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2022, 18(1): 44-57.
[4]	王倩之, 刘凯, 汪明. NEX-GDDP降尺度数据对中国极端降水指数模拟能力的评估[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2022, 18(1): 31-43.
[5]	廖宏, 谢佩芙. IPCC AR6报告解读：短寿命气候强迫因子的气候及环境效应[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2021, 17(6): 685-690.
[6]	左志燕, 肖栋. 从全球到区域气候变化[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2021, 17(6): 705-712.
[7]	曹龙. IPCC AR6报告解读：气候系统对二氧化碳移除响应[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2021, 17(6): 664-670.
[8]	王文, 傅文睿. IPCC AR6的“产生影响的气候因子”评估框架[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2021, 17(6): 719-725.
[9]	翟盘茂, 周佰铨, 陈阳, 余荣. 气候变化科学方面的几个最新认知[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2021, 17(6): 629-635.
[10]	王谋, 康文梅, 张莹. 应对气候变化南南合作优先合作国家选择方法探讨[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2021, 17(6): 744-752.
[11]	曹龙. IPCC AR6报告解读：气候系统对太阳辐射干预响应[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2021, 17(6): 671-684.
[12]	何佳骏, 任国玉, 张盼峰. 资料均一化对气温变化趋势及其城市化偏差估计的影响：以北京地区为例[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2021, 17(5): 503-513.
[13]	刘蕾. 应对气候变化进程中纳入性别考虑的进展与启示[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2021, 17(5): 548-558.
[14]	武占云. 将适应气候变化纳入国土空间规划：进展、困境与思路[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2021, 17(5): 559-569.
[15]	于晓龙, 刘援. 应对气候变化南南合作物资赠送项目评估研究[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2021, 17(5): 608-620.