气候变化研究进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1): 11-24.doi: 10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2016.053

• 气候系统变化 • 上一篇    下一篇

CMIP5 模式对中国极端气温及其变化趋势的模拟评估

蒋帅1,2,江志红1,李伟1,沈雨辰3   

  1. 1 南京信息工程大学气象灾害教育部重点实验室/ 气候与环境变化国际联合实验室/ 气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心,南京 210044;
    2 岳阳市气象局,岳阳 414000;
    3 无锡市气象局,无锡 214101
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-17 修回日期:2016-04-08 出版日期:2017-01-30 发布日期:2017-01-30
  • 通讯作者: 江志红 E-mail:zhjiang@nuist.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:蒋帅,男,硕士,348592871@qq.com;江志红(通信作者),女,教授,zhjiang@nuist.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金重点项目(41230528);国家重点研发项目(2016YFA0600402)

Evaluation of the Extreme Temperature and Its Trend in China Simulated by CMIP5 Models

Jiang Shuai1, 2, Jiang Zhihong1, Li Wei1, Shen Yuchen3   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education, Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change, Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;
    2 Yueyang Meteorological Bureau, Yueyang 414000, China; 3 Weather Bureau in Wuxi, Wuxi 214101, China
  • Received:2016-03-17 Revised:2016-04-08 Online:2017-01-30 Published:2017-01-30
  • Contact: Jang Zhihong E-mail:zhjiang@nuist.edu.cn

摘要:

本文基于中国区域逐日气温资料和CMIP5 中30 个全球气候模式资料,计算了平均日最高气温(TXAV)、平均日最低气温(TNAV)、热浪指数(HWDI)、霜冻日数(FD)、和暖夜指数(TNF90)5 个极端气温指数,评估各模式对中国区域极端气温的气候平均场和趋势的模拟能力。研究结果表明,大部分模式能够较好地模拟出极端指数的气候平均场,其中对TNAV、TXAV 和FD 平均场模拟能力较强,大部分模式平均场与观测场的相关系数超过0.90,但对TNF90 和HWDI 的模拟能力相对较低,相关系数均低于0.70,且各模式的模拟能力存在较大的差异。对极端指数的趋势模拟来说,模式模拟的中国区域平均各极端气温指数的线性变化趋势与观测相同,但大多数模式模拟趋势的强度偏弱。相比于气候平均场,模式对极端气温指数趋势空间场模拟较差,除TNAV 有1/3 的模式平均场与观测场的相关系数超过0.60 外,模式模拟其余指数的相关系数均低于0.60。模拟极端气温气候平均场的能力最优的5 个模式为:IPSL-CM5A-MR、CMCC-CM、IPSL-CM5A-LR、MPI-ESM-MR 和MPI-ESM-P。趋势空间场模拟最好的5 个模式为:MPI-ESM-P、CANESM2、ACCESS1-3、BCC-CSM1-1 和NorESM1-M。模式对极端气温指数的时空模拟能力一致性较差,但基于气候平均场或趋势空间场的优选模式,相比于所有集合模式平均,模拟能力均有一定程度的改善。

关键词: CMIP5, 极端气温, 趋势, 优选模式

Abstract:

Based on the observation of daily temperature data and 30 models data provided by Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), five extreme temperature indices including mean maximum temperature (TXAV), mean minimum temperature (TNAV), heat wave duration index (HWDI), frost days (FD) and warm nights (TNF90) have been calculated to evaluate simulation capability of each model in terms of spatial field in climate state and the trend of extreme temperature in China. Results show that most models can better reflect the spatial pattern of extreme temperature indices in climate state. The spatial pattern of TNAV, TAXV and FD can be better simulated, as the correlation coefficient of most models are more than 0.9, and there are good consistency between models. TNF90 and HWDI are poorly captured by models, as the correlation coefficient are lower than 0.7 and there are large differences between models. Models also simulate the same trend change of average extreme temperature index at national scale as the observation, but their most simulation strength of trend are weak. Compared with spatial pattern in climate state, the models simulation of trend spatial pattern for extreme temperature are not good. Thereinto, TNAV is relatively well simulated, the correlation coefficient of a third of models are larger than 0.6. The correlation coefficient for other indices are lower than 0.6. The models simulation ability ranks of space and time are in good consistency. Based on the comprehensive space-time simulation ability, the top 5 models are MPI-ESM-P, CMCC-CM, IPSL-CM5A-LR, CESM1-CAM5 and ACCESS1-3. The best multi-models ensemble (BMME) can reduce the biases and narrow the biases areas.

Key words: CMIP5, extreme temperature, trend, best multi-models ensemble

京ICP备11008704号-4
版权所有 © 《气候变化研究进展》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村南大街46号 邮编:100081 电话/传真:(010)58995171 E-mail:accr@cma.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn