混合制度复合体视域下新时代中国气候外交的战略选择

doi:10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2023.047

气候变化研究进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4): 520-529.doi: 10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2023.047

混合制度复合体视域下新时代中国气候外交的战略选择

王硕¹^,²

1 郑州大学政治与公共管理学院，郑州 450001
2 郑州大学当代资本主义研究中心，郑州 450001

收稿日期:2023-03-20 修回日期:2023-04-13 出版日期:2023-07-30 发布日期:2023-06-07
作者简介:王硕，女，讲师，wangshuo1211@zzu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金一般项目《气候治理机制复杂化和对策研究》(20BGJ018);河南省博士后科研资助项目《“混合驱动”的全球气候治理体系下中国气候外交战略选择》(HN2022174)

The strategic choice of China’s climate diplomacy in the new era from the perspective of Hybrid Institutional Complexes

WANG Shuo¹^,²

1 School of Politics and Public Administration, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
2 Center for Contemporary Capitalism Studies, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China

Received:2023-03-20 Revised:2023-04-13 Online:2023-07-30 Published:2023-06-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

当前的全球气候治理体系处于“混合驱动”的多元格局之下，气候混合制度复合体应运而生。气候混合制度复合体内的成分制度具有非正式等级性、异质性和双向遵从性，这超越了传统制度复合体的等级性、同质性和单向遵从性。该优势促使其成分制度在互动上基于功能效率理论和治理权力转移理论，表现出更高的实质性契合和政治契合，有助于推进全球气候治理朝着善治的方向前进。面对全球气候治理体系所处的态势和发展趋势，新时代的中国气候外交应进一步全方位增进在气候混合制度复合体中的参与维度，系统性增强其成分制度间的耦合协调度，并创新性地将中国优秀传统文化内蕴于气候混合制度复合体中，提供中国智慧和中国贡献。

关键词: 混合制度复合体, 全球气候治理

Abstract:

The current global climate governance system is in a diversified pattern of “hybrid driving”, and the Climate Hybrid Institutional Complexes (C-HIC) came into being. The composition system in the C-HIC has informal hierarchy, heterogeneity and two-way compliance, which goes beyond the hierarchy, homogeneity and one-way compliance of the traditional system complex. This advantage makes its constituent systems based on the functional efficiency theory and governance power transfer theory in interaction, showing a higher substantive fit and political fit, which is conducive to promoting global climate governance towards good governance. In the face of the situation and development trend of the global climate governance system, China’s climate diplomacy in the new era should further comprehensively enhance its participation in the C-HIC, systematically enhance the coupling and coordination between its constituent systems, and creatively embed Chinese excellent traditional culture in the C-HIC to provide Chinese wisdom and Chinese contributions.

Key words: Hybrid Institutional Complexes (HIC), Global climate governance

王硕. 混合制度复合体视域下新时代中国气候外交的战略选择[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2023, 19(4): 520-529.

WANG Shuo. The strategic choice of China’s climate diplomacy in the new era from the perspective of Hybrid Institutional Complexes[J]. Climate Change Research, 2023, 19(4): 520-529.

参考文献 24

[1]	Aklin M, Mildenberger M. Prisoners of the wrong dilemma: why distributive conflict, not collective action, characterizes the politics of climate change[M]. Norman: MIT Press, 2018
[2]	Abbott K W, Faude B. Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance[J]. International Organizations, 2022, 17: 263-291
[3]	于宏源, 李坤海. 全球气候治理的混合格局和中国参与[J]. 欧洲研究, 2022 (1): 64-84.
	Yu H Y, Li K H. The mixed pattern of global climate governance and China’s participation[J]. European Studies, 2022 (1): 64-84 (in Chinese)
[4]	Keohane Q R, Victor D G. The regime complex for climate change[J]. Perspectives on Politics, 2011, 9 (1): 7-23 doi: 10.1017/S1537592710004068 URL
[5]	Orsini C, Morin J F, Young O. Regime complexes: a buzz, a boom, or a boost for global governance?[J]. Global Governance, 2013, 19: 27-39 doi: 10.1163/19426720-01901003 URL
[6]	宋亦明. 制度竞争与国际制度的等级制[J]. 世界经济与政治, 2021 (4): 33-60.
	Song Y M. Institutional competition and the hierarchy of international institutions[J]. World Economy and Politics, 2021 (4): 33-60 (in Chinese)
[7]	Laura G M. International regime complexity and regional governance: evidence from the Americas[J]. Global Governance, 2015, 21 (1): 19-42 doi: 10.1163/19426720-02101004 URL
[8]	Ostrom E. Polycentric systems for coping with collective and global, environmental change[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2010, 20 (4): 550-557 doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004 URL
[9]	李慧明. 全球气候治理与国际秩序转型[J]. 世界经济与政治, 2017 (3): 62-85.
	Li H M. Global climate governance and the transformation of the international order[J]. World Economy and Politics, 2017 (3): 62-85 (in Chinese)
[10]	Jonathan W K, Bj?rn O L, Heike S. Non-state actors in hybrid global climate governance: justice, legitimacy, and effectiveness in a post-Paris era[J]. WIREs Climate Change, 2017, 9: 1-18
[11]	Claire D. Initiative climate international[EB/OL]. 2022 [2023-04-11]. https://www.greenprojecttech.com/newsroom/initiative-climatinternational
[12]	于宏源, 余博闻. 低碳经济背景下的全球气候治理新趋势[J]. 国际问题研究, 2016 (5): 48-61.
	Yu H Y, Yu B W. New trends in global climate governance against the background of a low carbon economy[J]. International Studies, 2016 (5): 48-61 (in Chinese)
[13]	余博闻. 认知演化与全球气候治理的变革[J]. 世界经济与政治, 2019 (12): 101-133.
	Yu B W. Cognitive evolution and changes in global climate governance[J]. World Economy and Politics, 2019 (12): 101-133 (in Chinese)
[14]	Hoffmann M J. Climate governance at the crossroads: experimenting with a global response after Kyoto[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011: 66
[15]	Abbott K W. Strengthening the transnational regime complex for climate change[J]. Transnational Environmental Law, 2014, 3 (1): 57-88 doi: 10.1017/S2047102513000502 URL
[16]	Zelli F. The fragmentation of the global climate governance architecture[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2011, 2 (2): 55-70
[17]	Chan S, Eichhorn F, Biermann F, et al. A momentum for change? Systemic effects and catalytic impacts of transnational climate action[J]. Earth System Governance, 2021, 9: 1-9
[18]	Streck C. Strengthening the Paris Agreement by holding non-state actors accountable: establishing normative links between transnational partnerships and treaty implementation[J]. Transnational Environmental Law, 2021, 10 (3): 493-515 doi: 10.1017/S2047102521000091 URL
[19]	Tyler P. Deference and hierarchy in international regime complexes[J]. International Organization, 2018, 72 (3): 561-590 doi: 10.1017/S0020818318000164 URL
[20]	Karen J A, Sophie M. The politics of international regime complexity[J]. Political Science, 2009, 7 (1): 13-24
[21]	Keohane O R, Victor D G. Cooperation and discord in global climate policy[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6: 571-575
[22]	Ostrom E. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015: 415-417
[23]	Frank B, van Driel M, Vijge J M. Architectures of Earth system governance[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020: 158-180
[24]	Elizabeth C W, Mark A, Tom A, et al. Designing the climate observing systems of the future[J]. USGCRP Climate Observations, 2016, 6 (1): 1-24

混合制度复合体视域下新时代中国气候外交的战略选择

The strategic choice of China’s climate diplomacy in the new era from the perspective of Hybrid Institutional Complexes

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 24

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	樊星, 高翔. 国家自主贡献更新进展、特征及其对全球气候治理的影响[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2022, 18(2): 230-239.
[2]	樊星,王际杰,王田,高翔. 马德里气候大会盘点及全球气候治理展望[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(3): 367-372.
[3]	刘硕,李玉娥,秦晓波,高清竹,万运帆. 《巴黎协定》实施细则适应议题焦点解析及后续中国应对措施[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2019, 15(4): 436-444.
[4]	陈兰,王文涛,朱留财,张黛玮. 绿色气候基金在全球气候治理体系中的作用和展望[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2019, 15(3): 326-334.
[5]	朱松丽. 从巴黎到卡托维兹：全球气候治理中的统一和分裂[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2019, 15(2): 206-211.
[6]	张永香, 巢清尘, 郑秋红, 黄磊. 美国退出《巴黎协定》对全球气候治理的影响[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2017, 13(5): 407-414.
[7]	张海滨, 戴瀚程, 赖华夏, 王文涛. 美国退出《巴黎协定》的原因、影响及中国的对策[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2017, 13(5): 439-447.