气候变化研究进展 ›› 2025, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (5): 684-697.doi: 10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2025.066

• 气候变化减缓 • 上一篇    下一篇

英国、德国、法国碳预算制度的比较研究及对我国的启示

李佳馨1(), 顾佰和1,2(), 于东晖1,2   

  1. 1 中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院北京 100049
    2 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院北京 100190
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-21 修回日期:2025-06-15 出版日期:2025-09-30 发布日期:2025-09-01
  • 通讯作者: 顾佰和,男,副研究员,gubaihe@casisd.cn
  • 作者简介:李佳馨,女,硕士研究生,lijiaxin233@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金专项项目(72140007);中国科学院青年创新促进会会员项目(2022151)

A comparative study of the carbon budget systems in the UK, Germany and France and the implications for China

LI Jia-Xin1(), GU Bai-He1,2(), YU Dong-Hui1,2   

  1. 1 School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    2 Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • Received:2025-03-21 Revised:2025-06-15 Online:2025-09-30 Published:2025-09-01

摘要:

碳预算作为支撑我国“双碳”目标实现的重要政策措施,为实现“双碳”目标提供了制度保障和量化路径。系统比较不同国家碳预算制度的设计与实施模式,对于我国碳预算制度的构建具有重要借鉴意义。文中从顶层设计、目标分解、监测评估及调整机制4个方面,对英国、德国和法国的碳预算制度进行比较分析。结果表明,三国均通过立法确立了碳预算框架,但在实施模式上呈现差异:英国采用五年期碳预算,基于部门减排潜力设定目标;德国实施行业年度碳预算,并设有缺口填补机制;法国按照部门和温室气体种类细化五年预算。此外,三国均建立了独立评估体系,成立独立的专家委员会,但预算调整机制存在差异。未来我国可结合碳排放强度和总量调控的政策实践,稳步推进碳预算管理,完善法律保障,采用上下互动和行业分解的模式,强化科学支撑,并建立动态调整机制,为“双碳”目标的实现提供系统化的政策支撑。

关键词: 碳预算, 国际经验, 碳排放双控, 目标分解

Abstract:

Carbon budgets serve as a crucial policy measure supporting the achievement of China’s “dual carbon” goals, providing institutional safeguards and quantifiable pathways for their realization. A systematic comparison of the design and implementation models of carbon budget systems across different countries holds significant implications for the development of China’s own carbon budget system. In this paper, the carbon budget systems of the UK, Germany and France were compared and analyzed in terms of top-level design, target decomposition, monitoring and evaluation, and adjustment mechanism. The results show that all three countries have established a carbon budget framework through legislation, but there are differences in the implementation modes: the UK adopts a five-year carbon budget system and sets targets based on sectoral emission reduction potentials; Germany implements annual sectoral emission budgets and has a gap-filling mechanism; France refines the five-year budgets according to the sectors and types of greenhouse gases. In addition, all three countries have established independent assessment systems and independent expert committees, but there are differences in the budget adjustment mechanisms. In the future, China can combine carbon emission intensity and total volume control policy practices to steadily advance carbon budget management, improve legal safeguards, adopt a top-down and industry-specific approach, strengthen scientific support, and establish a dynamic adjustment mechanism to provide systematic policy support for the achievement of the “dual carbon” goals.

Key words: Carbon budget, International experience, Dual control of carbon emissions, Target decomposition

京ICP备11008704号-4
版权所有 © 《气候变化研究进展》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村南大街46号 邮编:100081 电话/传真:(010)58995171 E-mail:accr@cma.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn