碳交易下控排行业基准值的设定框架研究

doi:10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2023.063

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

从碳交易市场配额分配相关制度中可知，我国目前主要采用基准值法分配配额。如何对行业设定基准值是应用该方法时面临的关键问题，然而目前关于基准值设定问题的研究较少且聚焦于对单个行业的分析。随着我国控排行业的增加，单独设定每个控排行业的基准值会忽视不同行业成本变动对整体行业经济的影响。基于此，文中提出在“全行业层面+单个行业层面”的研究框架下对基准值进行设定，一方面弥补了现行单个行业基准值设定方式对经济影响的忽视，另一方面保留了现行基准值设定方式的优势。结果表明，基础性行业的价格变动会对整体行业产生较大影响，因此往往需要对其设定较高的基准值。

关键词: 行业基准值, 碳交易, 投入产出局部闭价格模型, 非线性规划

Abstract:

From the relevant mechanism of quota allocation in the carbon trading market, we can see that China currently mainly uses the benchmark method to allocate quotas. How to set the benchmark value of the industry is the key problem in adopting this method. However, there is only limited research on the problem of setting benchmark value, which mainly focuses on the analysis of single industry. With the increasing number of carbon emissions control industries in China, setting the benchmark of each industry separately will ignore the impact of cost changes in different industries on the whole industry economy. Therefore, this paper proposes to set the benchmark under the research framework of “whole-industry+single-industry”, which compensates for the neglect of the economic impact of the present single industry benchmark and maintains the advantages of the present single industry benchmark. The results show that the price changes in the basic industries have a great impact on the whole industry, so that it is usually necessary to set higher benchmark values for these industries.

Key words: Industry benchmarks, Carbon emissions trading, Extended I-O price model, Non-linear programming

张春丽. 碳交易下控排行业基准值的设定框架研究[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2023, 19(5): 645-652.

ZHANG Chun-Li. Research on setting framework of carbon emissions control industry’s benchmarks under carbon emissions trading[J]. Climate Change Research, 2023, 19(5): 645-652.

图/表 2

参考文献 18

[1]	段茂盛, 庞韬. 全国统一碳排放权交易体系中的配额分配方式研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2014, 67 (5): 5-12.
	Duan M S, Pang T. Key issues in allowance allocation in China’s future unified national emissions trading scheme[J]. Wuhan University Journal (Philosophy & Social Science), 2014, 67 (5): 5-12 (in Chinese)
[2]	谭琦璐, 刘兰婷, 朱松丽. 全国碳交易下中国钢铁行业的基准线法研究[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2021, 17 (5): 590-597.
	Tan Q L, Liu L T, Zhu S L. Study on the benchmark method for national carbon trading in China’s iron and steel industry[J]. Climate Change Reseach, 2021, 17 (5): 590-597 (in Chinese)
[3]	陈操操, 邱大庆, 刘耕源, 等. 北京试点碳市场行业基准值研究: 以供热行业为例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2023, 43 (1): 456-464.
	Chen C C, Qiu D Q, Liu G Y, et al. Industry benchmark research of Beijing carbon trade pilot: a case study in thermal industry[J]. China Environmental Science, 2023, 43 (1): 456-464 (in Chinese)
[4]	鲁虹佑, 周勇. 如何在碳交易市场下对工业部门进行碳排放权分配: 加州碳排放权交易市场的经验[J]. 科学与管理, 2013, 33 (5): 15-19.
	Lu H Y, Zhou Y. Direct allocation of emission allowances for industrial sectors: experience from California’s cap and trade program[J]. Science and Management, 2013, 33 (5): 15-19 (in Chinese)
[5]	张宁, 贺姝峒, 王军锋, 等. 碳交易背景下天津市电力行业碳排放强度与基准线[J]. 环境科学研究, 2018, 31 (1): 187-193. DOI: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2017.03.35.
	Zhang N, He S T, Wang J F, et al. Carbon intensity and benchmarking analysis of power industry in Tianjin under the context of cap-and-trade[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31 (1): 187-193 (in Chinese)
[6]	惠婧璇, 朱松丽. 全国碳排放权交易市场下电解铝行业基准线法研究[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2022, 18 (3): 366-372.
	Hui J X, Zhu S L. Study on the benchmark method of China’s electricity aluminum sector under national carbon emission trading market[J]. Climate Change Research, 2022, 18 (3): 366-372 (in Chinese)
[7]	Carb. California air resources board: development of product benchmarks for allowance allocation[R/OL]. 2011 [2023-03-21]. https://www.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/cap-and-trade/meetings/072011/product-benchmarks.pdf
[8]	European Commission. Update of benchmark values for the years 2021-2025 of phase 4 of the EU ETS[R/OL]. 2021 [2023-03-25]. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/system/files/2021-10/policy_ets_allowances_bm_curve_factsheets_en.pdf
[9]	European Commission. EU ETS handbook[R/OL]. 2015 [2023-03-22].
[10]	Mankiw N G. Principles of microeconomics (6th edition)[M]. Stamford: Cengage Learning, 2011
[11]	石敏俊, 王妍, 朱杏珍. 能源价格波动与粮食价格波动对城乡经济关系的影响: 基于城乡投入产出模型[J]. 中国农村经济, 2009 (5): 4-13.
	Shi M J, Wang Y, Zhu X Z. The impact of energy price fluctuation and food price fluctuation on urban-rural economic relations: based on urban-rural input-output model[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2009 (5): 4-13 (in Chinese)
[12]	Saari M Y, Dietzenbacher E, Los B. The impacts of petroleum price fluctuations on income distribution across ethnic groups in Malaysia[J]. Ecological Economics, 2016, 130: 25-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.05.021
[13]	Chang N, Han C H. Cost-push impact of taxing carbon in China: a price transmission perspective[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 248: 119-194. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119194
[14]	罗纳德.E.米勒, 彼得.D.布莱尔. 投入产出分析基础与扩展(第二版)[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2019: 29-34.
	Miller R E, Blair P D. Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions (second edition)[M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2019: 29-34 (in Chinese)
[15]	Leontief W W. Interrelation of prices, output, savings, and investment[J]. The Review of Economic Statistics, 1937, 19 (3): 109-132. DOI: 10.2307/1927343
[16]	IPCC. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories[R/OL]. 2003 [2021-06-01]. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/2006-ipccguidelines-for-national-greenhouse-gas-inventories/
[17]	国家统计局能源统计司. 中国能源统计年鉴2021[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2021.
	Department of Energy Statistics, National Bureau of Statistics. China energy statistical yearbook in 2021[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2021 (in Chinese)
[18]	李芳林, 王玲玲. 国民经济核算原理与应用分析[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2020: 78-80.
	Li F L, Wang L L. Analysis of principles and applications of national economic accounting[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2020: 78-80 (in Chinese)