Arguments on Oceanic Carbon Cycle of IPCC Assessments——A Test Using δ13C Budgets

气候变化研究进展 ›› 2009, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (00): 19-24.

• Scientific Basis • 上一篇下一篇

Arguments on Oceanic Carbon Cycle of IPCC Assessments——A Test Using δ¹³C Budgets

Chen Zhongxiao1, 2, Jiang Aijun2, 3, Ren Huijun2, Cheng Jun2, Kato Kikuo4, Oomori Tamotsu5

1 Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster of Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China; 2 College of Atmospheric Science, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China; 3 Nanjing Meteorological Administration, Nanjing 210009, China; 4 Hydrospheric Atmospheric Research Center, Nagoya University, Nagoya Aichi 464-8601, Japan; 5 Faculty of Science, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara-Cho Okinawa 903-0213, Japan

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2009-10-30 发布日期:2009-10-30

Arguments on Oceanic Carbon Cycle of IPCC Assessments——A Test Using δ¹³C Budgets

Chen Zhongxiao1, 2, Jiang Aijun2, 3, Ren Huijun2, Cheng Jun2, Kato Kikuo4, Oomori Tamotsu5

1 Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster of Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China; 2 College of Atmospheric Science, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China; 3 Nanjing Meteorological Administration, Nanjing 210009, China; 4 Hydrospheric Atmospheric Research Center, Nagoya University, Nagoya Aichi 464-8601, Japan; 5 Faculty of Science, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara-Cho Okinawa 903-0213, Japan

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2009-10-30 Published:2009-10-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： By comparing the global carbon cycle of the IPCC assessment reports in 1990, 1996, 2001 and 2007, it was found that despite the estimated sizes of the main carbon reservoirs and the fluxes between them in the four reports were similar, the estimated carbon fluxes between surface and intermediate-deep sea waters were quite different. The δ¹³C budget was used to test the reasonable range of these fluxes. The results show that the IPCC assessment reports in 1996 and 2007 have overestimated, whereas those in 1990 and 2001 underestimated the fluxes between surface and intermediate-deep sea waters.

关键词: IPCC, CO₂ budget, δ¹³C, isotope fractionation

Abstract: By comparing the global carbon cycle of the IPCC assessment reports in 1990, 1996, 2001 and 2007, it was found that despite the estimated sizes of the main carbon reservoirs and the fluxes between them in the four reports were similar, the estimated carbon fluxes between surface and intermediate-deep sea waters were quite different. The δ¹³C budget was used to test the reasonable range of these fluxes. The results show that the IPCC assessment reports in 1996 and 2007 have overestimated, whereas those in 1990 and 2001 underestimated the fluxes between surface and intermediate-deep sea waters.

Key words: IPCC, CO₂ budget, δ¹³C, isotope fractionation

Chen Zhongxiao;;Jiang Aijun;;Ren Huijun;Cheng Jun;Kato Kikuo;Oomori Tamotsu. Arguments on Oceanic Carbon Cycle of IPCC Assessments——A Test Using δ¹³C Budgets[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2009, 5(00): 19-24.

Chen Zhongxiao;;Jiang Aijun;;Ren Huijun;Cheng Jun;Kato Kikuo;Oomori Tamotsu. Arguments on Oceanic Carbon Cycle of IPCC Assessments——A Test Using δ¹³C Budgets[J]. Climate Change Research, 2009, 5(00): 19-24.

[1]	朱松丽, 蔡博峰, 朱建华, 高庆先, 张称意, 于胜民, 方双喜, 潘学标. IPCC国家温室气体清单指南精细化的主要内容和启示[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2018, 14(1): 86-94.
[2]	孙颖, 秦大河, 周波涛. 未来气候变化科学研究的主要方向和挑战[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2015, 11(5): 324-330.
[3]	张称意，巢清尘，袁佳双，林光辉，孙除荣. 《对2006 IPCC国家温室气体清单指南的2013增补：湿地》的解析[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2014, 10(6): 440-444.
[4]	邹骥, 滕飞, 傅莎. 减缓气候变化社会经济评价研究的最新进展——对IPCC第五次评估报告第三工作组报告的评述[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2014, 10(5): 313-322.
[5]	朱松丽, 张海滨, 温刚, 钱国强. 对IPCC第五次评估报告减缓气候变化国际合作评估结果的解读[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2014, 10(5): 340-347.
[6]	胡秀莲, 苗韧. 对IPCC第五次评估报告部门减排路径和措施评估结果的解读[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2014, 10(5): 331-339.
[7]	傅莎, 邹骥, 张晓华, 姜克隽. IPCC第五次评估报告历史排放趋势和未来减缓情景相关核心结论解读分析[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2014, 10(5): 323-330.
[8]	翟建青占明锦苏布达姜彤. 对IPCC第五次评估报告中有关淡水资源相关结论的解读[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2014, 10(4): 240-245.
[9]	谢立勇李悦徐玉秀赵迅宋艳玲姜彤林而达. 气候变化对农业生产与粮食安全影响的新认知[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2014, 10(4): 235-239.
[10]	侯威, 朱晓金, 姜彤. IPCC第五次评估报告对跨区域影响的新认识[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2014, 10(3): 191-196.
[11]	姜彤, 李修仓, 巢清尘, 袁佳双, 林而达. 《气候变化2014：影响、适应和脆弱性》的主要结论和新认知[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2014, 10(3): 157-166.
[12]	张晓华, 高云, 祁悦. IPCC第五次评估报告第二工作组报告的主要结论对2015协议谈判的影响分析[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2014, 10(3): 175-178.
[13]	张晓华, 高云, 祁悦, 傅莎. IPCC第五次评估报告第一工作组主要结论对《联合国气候变化框架公约》进程的影响分析[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2014, 10(1): 14-19.
[14]	巢清尘,周波涛,孙颖,张永香,黄磊. IPCC气候变化自然科学认知的发展[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2014, 10(1): 7-13.
[15]	秦大河, Thomas Stocker, 259名作者和TSU（驻伯尔尼和北京）. IPCC第五次评估报告第一工作组报告的亮点结论[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2014, 10(1): 1-6.

Arguments on Oceanic Carbon Cycle of IPCC Assessments——A Test Using δ¹³C Budgets

Arguments on Oceanic Carbon Cycle of IPCC Assessments——A Test Using δ¹³C Budgets

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价