气候变化研究进展 ›› 2011, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2): 116-122.

• 气候系统变化 • 上一篇    下一篇

2011—2050年长江流域气候变化预估问题的探讨

曾小凡1,周建中1,翟建青2,苏布达2,熊明3   

  1. 1. 华中科技大学水电与数字化工程学院
    2. 中国气象局国家气候中心
    3. 长江水利委员会水文局
  • 收稿日期:2010-09-28 修回日期:2010-11-16 出版日期:2011-03-30 发布日期:2011-04-07
  • 通讯作者: 曾小凡 E-mail:zengxiaofan2009@gmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    973项目;自然科学基金

Research on Climate Projection for the Period 2011-2050 in the Yangtze River Basin

  • Received:2010-09-28 Revised:2010-11-16 Online:2011-03-30 Published:2011-04-07
  • Contact: Xiaofan Zeng E-mail:zengxiaofan2009@gmail.com

摘要: 利用长江流域1961—2008年观测气象资料,对IPCC 第四次评估报告中12个全球气候模式及所有模式集合平均进行比较验证,结果表明:MIUB_ECHO_G模式对该地区降水模拟能力较强,NCAR_CCSM3模式对温度模拟效果较好。进一步利用MIUB_ECHO_G模式和NCAR_CCSM3模式结果在SRES-A2、-A1B、-B1 3种排放情景下的降水和温度数据,分析2011—2050年3种排放情景下长江流域降水和温度变化特征。结果表明,2011—2050年长江流域降水变化趋势不明显,温度呈增加趋势,增幅在2℃内。

关键词: 气候模式比较, 气候预估, 排放情景, 长江流域, comparison of GCMs, climate projection, emission scenarios, Yangtze River basin

Abstract: Simulation abilities of different global climate models (GCMs) are different for a specific region. To select the applicable GCMs to project climate change in the Yangtze River basin, observed climate data from 1961 to 2008 were used to compare the 12 GCMs from IPCC-AR4. The results show that MIUB_ECHO_G model had better simulation ability for precipitation than the rest GCMs, and NCAR_CCSM3 model had better simulation ability for temperature. Based on the projected data by the two models, future annual and seasonal precipitation and temperature anomalies for 2011-2050, relative to the reference period of 1971-2000, under the SRES-A2, -A1B, and -B1 scenarios, were analyzed. Projected precipitation does not show obvious changing trends under the three different scenarios and projected temperature shows continuous increasing trends with an increasing range within 2 ℃.

京ICP备11008704号-4
版权所有 © 《气候变化研究进展》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村南大街46号 邮编:100081 电话/传真:(010)58995171 E-mail:accr@cma.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn