气候变化研究进展 ›› 2013, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (3): 181-186.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1719.2013.03.004

• CMIP5专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

CMIP5模式对中国年平均气温模拟及其与CMIP3模式的比较

郭彦1,董文杰1,任福民2,赵宗慈3,黄建斌3   

  1. 1 北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室
    2 中国气象局国家气候中心
    3 清华大学地球系统数值模拟教育部重点实验室/清华大学地球系统科学研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2012-12-04 修回日期:2013-03-26 出版日期:2013-05-30 发布日期:2013-05-30
  • 通讯作者: 郭彦 E-mail:guoyan@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    全球变化研究国家重大科学研究计划项目“基于CMIP5多模式模拟试验的气候变化集合预估和归因分析研究”

Assessment of CMIP5 Simulations for China Annual Average Surface Temperature and Its Comparison with CMIP3 Simulations

Guo Yan1, Dong Wenjie1, Ren Fumin2, Zhao Zongci3, Huang Jianbin3     

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University
    2 National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration
    3 Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Earth System Modeling, Center for Earth System Science, Tsinghua University 
  • Received:2012-12-04 Revised:2013-03-26 Online:2013-05-30 Published:2013-05-30
  • Contact: Yan Guo E-mail:guoyan@bnu.edu.cn

摘要: 利用CRUT3v和CN05两套观测资料,评估25个CMIP5模式对1906—2005年中国年平均气温变化的模拟能力,并与CMIP3模式对比。结果表明:1906—2005年中国平均温升速率为0.84℃/100a,CMIP5多模式集合平均模拟的增温率为0.77℃/100a。模式对20世纪后期温升模拟好于前期,仅有两个模式能模拟中国20世纪40年代异常增暖。模式对气温气候态空间分布模拟较好,但在中国西部地区存在最大模拟冷偏差和不确定性。1961—1999年,中国北方增暖大于南方。多模式集合平均可以较好地模拟气温变化线性趋势的空间分布,但对南北气温变化趋势的差异模拟过小。总体说来,在中国平均气温变化趋势、气温气候态空间分布和气温变化趋势空间分布三方面,CMIP5模式都较CMIP3模式有所提高。

关键词: CMIP5/CMIP3, 中国, 年平均气温, 历史模拟, 评估

Abstract: The simulation for China annual average surface temperature by CMIP5 models was assessed, referring to the observation data from CRUT3v and CN05. The results show that CMIP5 models are able to simulate the warming occurring in China over 1906-2005 with a trend of 0.77℃/100a from the multi-model ensemble mean, close to the observed value of 0.84℃/100a. The simulations of warming for the late 20th century are much better than that for the early 20th century, and only 2 out of the 25 CMIP5 models can capture the anomalous warming period around the 1940s. The simulations for the China-wide distribution of 20-year (1986-2005) averaged surface temperature are broadly well. However, notable underestimations for surface temperature climatology appear almost all over China, and the largest bias and uncertainty occur over western China. On the regional scale, northern China experienced stronger warming than southern China over the period of 1961-1999, for which the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble mean provides roughly realistic simulations, but underestimates the difference in warming trends between the North and the South. To sum up, the simulations from CMIP5 models are obviously improved in the three aspects mentioned above, compared with the CMIP3 simulations.

Key words: CMIP5/CMIP3, China, annual average surface temperature, historical simulation, assessment

京ICP备11008704号-4
版权所有 © 《气候变化研究进展》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村南大街46号 邮编:100081 电话/传真:(010)58995171 E-mail:accr@cma.gov.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn