An overview of the Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project (ISMIP) in CMIP6

doi:10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2019.268

Figures/Tables 4

Fig. 1 The main physical processes in ice sheet model (including glacier flow dynamics, atmospheric and ocean circulations)

Fig. 2 The framework of ISMIP6 [11] (acquiring the forcing fields from climate model as the inputs of ice sheet model to project the sea-level rise, and exploring the feedback interactions between ice sheet and other components of climate system)

Tab.1 The experiment design of ISMIP6

Tab.2 All the participant of ice sheet models, their affiliated institutes and countries in ISMIP6

References

[1]	Li T, Liu Y, Li T , et al. Antarctic surface ice velocity retrieval from MODIS-based Mosaic of Antarctica (MOA)[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018,10(7):1045
[2]	Fricker H A, Siegfried M R, Carter S P , et al. A decade of progress in observing and modelling Antarctic subglacial water systems[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2016,374(2059):20140294. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0294
[3]	Li T, Shokr M, Liu Y , et al. Monitoring the tabular icebergs C28A and C28B calved from the Mertz Ice Tongue using radar remote sensing data[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2018,216:615-625. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.07.028
[4]	Liu Y, Cheng X, Hui F , et al. Detection of crevasses over polar ice shelves using Satellite Laser Altime-ter[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2014,57(6):1267-1277. DOI: 10.1007/s11430-013-4796-x
[5]	Liu Y, Moore J C, Cheng X , et al. Ocean-driven thinning enhances iceberg calving and retreat of Antarctic ice shelves[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015,112(11):3263-3268. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1415137112
[6]	Payne A J, Huybrechts P, Abe-Ouchi A , et al. Results from the EISMINT model intercomparison: the effects of thermomechanical coupling[J]. Journal of Glaciology, 2000,46(153):227-238. DOI: 10.3189/172756500781832891
[7]	Bindschadler R A, Nowicki S, Abe-Ouchi A , et al. Ice-sheet model sensitivities to environmental forcing and their use in projecting future sea level (the SeaRISE project)[J]. Journal of Glaciology, 2013,59(214):195-224. DOI: 10.3189/2013jog12j125
[8]	Pattyn F, Schoof C, Perichon L , et al. Results of the Marine Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project, MISMIP[J]. The Cryosphere, 2012,6(3):573-588. DOI: 10.5194/tc-6-573-2012
[9]	Pattyn F, Perichon L, Durand G , et al. Grounding-line migration in plan-view marine ice-sheet models: results of the ice2sea MISMIP3d intercomparison[J]. Journal of Glaciology, 2013,59(215):410-422. DOI: 10.3189/2013jog12j129
[10]	Asay-Davis X S, Cornford S L, Durand G , et al. Experimental design for three interrelated marine ice sheet and ocean model intercomparison projects: MISMIP v. 3 (MISMIP +), ISOMIP v. 2 (ISOMIP +) and MISOMIP v. 1 (MISOMIP1)[J]. Geoscientific Model Development, 2016,9(7):2471-2497. DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-2471-2016
[11]	Nowicki S M J, Payne A, Larour E , et al. Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project (ISMIP6) contribution to CMIP6[J]. Geoscientific Model Development, 2016,9(12):4521-4545. DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-4521-2016
[12]	郑伟鹏, 满文敏, 孙咏 , 等. 第四次国际古气候模拟比较计划(PMIP4)概况与评述[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2019,15(5):510-518.
[12]	Zheng W P, Man W M, Sun Y , et al. Short commentary on CMIP6 Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project Phase 4 (PMIP4)[J]. Climate Change Research, 2019,15(5):510-518 (in Chinese)
[13]	张丽霞, 陈晓龙, 辛晓歌 . CMIP6情景模式比较计划(ScenarioMIP)概况与评述[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2019,15(5):519-525.
[13]	Zhang L X, Chen X L, Xin X G . Short commentary on CMIP6 Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP)[J]. Climate Change Research, 2019,15(5):519-525 (in Chinese)
[14]	Edwards T L, Fettweis X, Gagliardini O , et al. Effect of uncertainty in surface mass balance: elevation feedback on projections of the future sea level contribution of the Greenland ice sheet[J]. The Cryosphere, 2014,8(1):195-208. DOI: 10.5194/tc-8-195-2014
[15]	Seroussi H, Nowicki S, Simon E , et al. InitMIP-Antarctica: an ice sheet model initialization experiment of ISMIP6[J]. The Cryosphere, 2019,13(5):1441-1471. DOI: 10.5194/tc-13-1441-2019
[16]	Goelzer H, Nowicki S, Edwards T , et al. Design and results of the ice sheet model initialization experiments initMIP-Greenland: an ISMIP6 intercomparison[J]. The Cryosphere, 2018,12(4):1433-1460. DOI: 10.5194/tc-12-1433-2018
[17]	Barthel A, Agosta C, Little C M , et al. CMIP5 model selection for ISMIP6 ice sheet model forcing: Greenland and Antarctica[J]. The Cryosphere Discussions, 2019: 1-34. DOI: 10.5194/tc-2019-191
[18]	Holloway M D, Sime L C, Singarayer J S , et al. Antarctic last interglacial isotope peak in response to sea ice retreat not ice-sheet collapse[J]. Nature Communications, 2016,7(1). DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12293
[19]	Deconto R M, Pollard D . Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise[J]. Nature, 2016,531(7596):591-597. DOI: 10.1038/nature17145
[20]	Reese R, Albrecht T, Mengel M , et al. Antarctic sub-shelf melt rates via PICO[J]. The Cryosphere, 2018,12(6):1969-1985. DOI: 10.5194/tc- 1 2-1969-2018
[21]	de Rydt J, Gudmundsson G H . Coupled ice shelf-ocean modeling and complex grounding line retreat from a seabed ridge[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 2016,121(5):865-880. DOI: 10.1002/2015jf003791
[22]	Seroussi H, Morlighem M . Representation of basal melting at the grounding line in ice flow models[J]. The Cryosphere, 2018,12(10):3085-3096. DOI: 10.5194/tc-12-3085-2018
[23]	Moore J C, Gladstone R, Zwinger T , et al. Geoengineer polar glaciers to slow sea-level rise[J]. Nature, 2018,555(7696):303-305. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-03036-4
[24]	曹龙 . CMIP6地球工程模式比较计划(GeoMIP)概况与评述[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2019,15(5):487-492.
[24]	Cao L . Short commentary on CMIP6 Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)[J]. Climate Change Research, 2019,15(5):487-492 (in Chinese)
[25]	王磊, 包庆, 何编 . CMIP6高分辨率模式比较计划(HighResMIP)概况与评述[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2019,15(5):498-502.
[25]	Wang L, Bao Q, He B . Short commentary on CMIP6 High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP)[J]. Climate Change Research, 2019,15(5):498-502 (in Chinese)
[26]	于子棚, 林鹏飞, 刘海龙 , 等. CMIP6海洋模式比较计划(OMIP)概况与评述[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2019,15(5):503-509.
[26]	Yu Z P, Lin P F, Liu H L , et al. Short commentary on CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP)[J]. Climate Change Research, 2019,15(5):503-509 (in Chinese)
[27]	吴波, 辛晓歌 . CMIP6年代际气候预测计划(DCPP)概况与评述[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2019,15(5):476-480.
[27]	Wu B, Xin X G . Short commentary on CMIP6 Decadal Climate Prediction Project (DCPP)[J]. Climate Change Research, 2019,15(5):476-480 (in Chinese)
[28]	唐学远, 张占海, 孙波 . 南极冰盖数值模拟研究进展与展望[J]. 极地研究, 2006,18(4):290-300.
[28]	Tang X Y, Zhang Z H, Sun B . Progress and prospect in numerical modelling of the Antarctic Ice-Sheet[J]. Chinese Journal of Polar Research, 2006,18(4):290-300 (in Chinese)
[29]	Zhang T, Price S, Ju L , et al. A comparison of two Stokes ice sheet models applied to the Marine Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for plan view models (MISMIP3d)[J]. The Cryosphere, 2017,11(1):179-190. DOI: 10.5194/tc-11-179-2017
[30]	Sun S, Cornford S L, Liu Y , et al. Dynamic response of Antarctic ice shelves to bedrock uncertainty[J]. The Cryosphere, 2014,8(4):1561-1576. DOI: 10.5194/tc-8-1561-2014
[31]	Ding B, Yang K, Yang W , et al. Development of a water and enthalpy budget-based glacier mass balance model (WEB-GM) and its preliminary validation[J]. Water Resources Research, 2017,53(4):3146-3178. DOI: 10.1002/2016wr018865
[32]	Li H, Ng F, Li Z , et al. An extended “perfect-plasticity” method for estimating ice thickness along the flow line of mountain glaciers[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 2012,117(F1). DOI: 10.1029/2011jf002104
[33]	段克勤, 姚檀栋, 王宁练 , 等. 天山乌鲁木齐河源1号冰川变化的数值模拟及其对气候变化的响应分析[J]. 科学通报, 2012,57(36):3511-3515.
[33]	Duan K Q, Yao T D, Wang N L , et al. Numerical simulation of Urumqi Glacier No.1 in the eastern Tianshan, Central Asia from 2005 to 2070[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2012,57. DOI: 10.1007/s11434-012-5469-4
[34]	Leng W, Ju L, Gunzburger M , et al. A parallel high-order accurate finite element nonlinear Stokes ice sheet model and benchmark experiments[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 2012,117(F1). DOI: 10.1029/2011jf00196