CMIP6海洋模式比较计划（OMIP）概况与评述

doi:10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2019.086

气候变化研究进展 ›› 2019, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5): 503-509.doi: 10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2019.086

• 第六次国际耦合模式比较计划（CMIP6）评述及中国贡献专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

CMIP6海洋模式比较计划（OMIP）概况与评述

于子棚^1,²,林鹏飞^1,²(),刘海龙^1,²,李逸文^1,²,王雅琦^1,²,孙志阔^1,²,杨茜^1,²,马金峰^1,²,靳江波³,丁梦蓉^1,²,孟瑶^1,²

1 中国科学院大气物理研究所大气科学和地球流体力学数值模拟国家重点实验室（LASG,北京 100029
2 中国科学院大学地球与行星科学学院,北京 100049
3 中国科学院大气物理研究所国际气候与环境科学中心（ICCES,北京 100029

收稿日期:2019-04-16 修回日期:2019-06-02 出版日期:2019-09-30 发布日期:2019-09-30
通讯作者: 林鹏飞 E-mail:linpf@mail.iap.ac.cn
作者简介:于子棚,男,博士研究生;
基金资助:
国家重点研发专项(2016YFC1401601);国家重点研发专项(2016YFC1401401);自然科学基金面上项目(41576026);自然科学基金面上项目(41576025);自然科学基金面上项目(41776030);自然科学基金面上项目(41931183)

Short commentary on CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP)

Zi-Peng YU^1,²,Peng-Fei LIN^1,²(),Hai-Long LIU^1,²,Yi-Wen LI^1,²,Ya-Qi WANG^1,²,Zhi-Kuo SUN^1,²,Qian YANG^1,²,Jin-Feng MA^1,²,Jiang-Bo JIN³,Meng-Rong DING^1,²,Yao MENG^1,²

1 State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
2 College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3 International Center for Climate and Environment Sciences, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2019-04-16 Revised:2019-06-02 Online:2019-09-30 Published:2019-09-30
Contact: Peng-Fei LIN E-mail:linpf@mail.iap.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

海洋模式比较计划（OMIP）是第六次国际耦合模式比较计划（CMIP6）中的一个支撑子计划。OMIP致力于CMIP6中模式系统偏差来源及其影响这样一个重要科学问题。同时,OMIP也将在区域海平面变化和近期气候（未来10~30 a）或者年代际气候预测的相关科学问题上有重要贡献,这些问题被世界气候研究计划（WCRP）列为气候科学领域巨大挑战的科学问题。OMIP采用统一的大气外强迫数据集和通量计算方案,进行全球海洋-海冰耦合试验、示踪物试验以及生物地球化学循环试验。同时,OMIP提供了一套针对海洋变量的详细的诊断框架,这个框架既可以评估和改进模式模拟,也可以用于理解海洋-海冰过程在整个气候系统中的作用。

关键词: 系统偏差, 海洋变量, 诊断框架, 海洋模式比较计划（OMIP）

Abstract:

The Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP) is an endorsed project in the CMIP6. OMIP is dedicated to the important CMIP6 science questions of investigating the origins and consequences of systematic model biases. What’s more, OMIP primarily contributes to the regional sea level change and near-term projection grand challenges put forward by WCRP (World Climate Research Program). OMIP provides an experimental protocol for global ocean/sea-ice simulations, tracer experiments and interactive biogeochemical experiments forced with common atmospheric data sets to investigate the systematic model biases. Simultaneously, OMIP provides a detailed protocol for ocean diagnostics to be saved as part of CMIP6, and then it helps evaluate, understand, and improve the ocean, sea-ice/tracer, and biogeochemical components of climate and Earth system models contributing to CMIP6.

Key words: Systematic model biases, Ocean variables, Diagnostic protocol, Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP)

于子棚,林鹏飞,刘海龙,李逸文,王雅琦,孙志阔,杨茜,马金峰,靳江波,丁梦蓉,孟瑶. CMIP6海洋模式比较计划（OMIP）概况与评述[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2019, 15(5): 503-509.

Zi-Peng YU,Peng-Fei LIN,Hai-Long LIU,Yi-Wen LI,Ya-Qi WANG,Zhi-Kuo SUN,Qian YANG,Jin-Feng MA,Jiang-Bo JIN,Meng-Rong DING,Yao MENG. Short commentary on CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP)[J]. Climate Change Research, 2019, 15(5): 503-509.

图/表 4

表1 OMIP诊断框架的物理部分

Table 1 The diagnostic protocol for the physical component of OMIP

表2 JRA-55与CORE-II强迫场时/空分辨率的比较

Table 2 Comparison of spatial/temporal resolution between JRA-55 and CORE-II forcing data

表3 参与第1次OMIP试验的科研机构及其所采用的海洋模式信息

Table 3 Information of research institutions and ocean models participating in the first OMIP experiment

表4 中国参与CMIP6中OMIP试验的科研机构及其所采用的海洋模式信息

Table 4 Information of China’s scientific research institutions and the ocean models adopted participating in the OMIP experiment in CMIP6

参考文献

[1]	Llewellyn-Jones D, Edwards M C, Mutlow C T , et al. AATSR: global-change and surface-temperature measurements from Envisat[J]. ESA Bulletin ASE European Space Agency, 2001,105(105):11-21
[2]	Fu L L, Haines B J . The challenges in long-term altimetry calibration for addressing the problem of global sea level change[J]. Advinces in Space Research, 2013,51(8):1284-1300
[3]	Ablain M, Cazenave A, Larnicol G , et al. Improved sea level record over the satellite altimetry era (1993-2010) from the climate change initiative project[J]. Ocean Science Discussions, 2015,11(11):2029-2071
[4]	Njoku E G, Swanson L . Global measurements of sea surface temperature, wind speed and atmospheric water content from satellite microwave radiometry[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 1983,111(10):1977-1987
[5]	Bailey S W, Werdell P J . A multi-sensor approach for the on-orbit validation of ocean color satellite data products[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2006,102(1-2):12-23
[6]	Berger M, Camps A, Font J , et al. Measuring ocean salinity with ESA’s SMOS mission[J]. ESA Bulletin, 2002,111:113-121
[7]	Lagerloef G, Colomb F R, Vine L D , et al. The Aquarius/SAC-D mission: designed to meet the salinity remote sensing challenge[J]. Oceanography, 2008,21(1):68-81
[8]	Riser S C, Freeland H J, Roemmich D , et al. Fifteen years of ocean observations with the global Argo array[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2016,6(2):145-153
[9]	Durack P, Gleckler P, Landerer F , et al. Quantifying underestimates of long-term upper-ocean warming[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2014,4. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2389
[10]	Wunsch C . Global ocean integrals and means, with trend implications[J]. Annual Review of Marine Science, 2016,8(1):150902153948007
[11]	Wunsch C, Heimbach P. Dynamically and kinematically consistent global ocean circulation and ice state estimates[M]//Sielder G, Griffies S M, Gould J, et al. Ocean circulation and climate: a 21st century perspective. Oxford: Academic Press, 2013,103(2):553-579
[12]	B?ning C, Bryan F, Chassignet E , et al. The Pilot Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (P-OMIP) [C]. AGU Spring Meeting Abstracts, 2002
[13]	R?ske F . An atlas of surface fluxes based on the ECMWF re-analysis: a climatological dataset to force global ocean general circulation models [R]. Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, 2001: 1-31
[14]	R?ske F . A global heat and freshwater forcing dataset for ocean models[J]. Ocean Modelling, 2006,11(3):235-297
[15]	Danabasoglu G, Yeager S G, Bailey D , et al. North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part I: mean states[J]. Ocean Modelling, 2014,73(1):76-107
[16]	Danabasoglu G, Yeager S G, Kim W M , et al. North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part II: inter-annual to decadal variability[J]. Ocean Modelling, 2016,97(1):360
[17]	Downes S M, Farneti R, Uotila P , et al. An assessment of southern ocean water masses and sea ice during 1988-2007 in a suite of inter-annual CORE-II simulations[J]. Ocean Modelling, 2015,94:67-94
[18]	Farneti R, Downes S M, Griffies S M , et al. An assessment of Antarctic circumpolar current and southern ocean meridional overturning circulation during 1958-2007 in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations[J]. Ocean Modelling, 2015,93. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.07.009
[19]	Wang Q, Ilicak M, Gerdes R , et al. An assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations. Part I: sea ice and solid freshwater[J]. Ocean Modelling, 2016,99:110-132
[20]	Wang Q, Ilicak M, Gerdes R , et al. An assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations. Part II: liquid freshwater[J]. Ocean Modelling, 2016,99:86-109
[21]	Wang Q, Ilicak M, Gerdes R , et al. An assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations. Part III: hydrography and fluxes[J]. Ocean Modelling, 2016,99:65-90
[22]	Griffies S M, Danabasoglu G, Durack P J , et al. OMIP contribution to CMIP6: experimental and diagnostic protocol for the physical component of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project[J]. Geoscientific Model Development, 2016,9(9):3231-3296
[23]	Orr J C, Najjar R G, Olivier A , et al. Biogeochemical protocols and diagnostics for the CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP)[J]. Geoscientific Model Development, 2017,10(6):2169-2199
[24]	Large W G, Yeager S G . Diurnal to decadal global forcing for ocean and sea-ice models: the data sets and flux climatologies[R/OL]. 2004 [2019-01-16]. : 434
[25]	Large W G, Yeager S G . The global climatology of an interannually varying air-sea flux data set[J]. Climate Dynamics, 2009,33(2-3):341-364
[26]	Locarnini R, Mishonov A Antonov J I , et al. World ocean atlas 2013, volume 1: temperature [R/OL]. 2013 [ 2019- 01- 16].
[27]	Zweng M M, Reagan J R, Antonov J I et al. World ocean atlas 2013, volume 2: salinity [R/OL]. 2013 [ 2019- 01- 16].
[28]	IOC, SCOR, IAPSO. The international thermodynamic equation of seawater 2010: calculation and use of thermodynamic properties [R/OL]. 2010 [2019-01-16].
[29]	Dai A, Trenberth K . Estimates of freshwater discharge from continents: latitudinal and seasonal variations[J]. Hydrometeorol, 2002,3:660-687
[30]	Kobayashi S, Ota Y, Harada Y , et al. The JRA-55 reanalysis: general specifications and basic characteristics[J]. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan Ser II, 2015,93(1):5-48
[31]	Liu H L, Lin P F, Yu Y Q , et al. The baseline evaluation of LASG/IAP Climate System Ocean Model (LICOM) version 2[J]. Acta Meteorological Sinica, 2012,26:318-329
[32]	Lin P F, Liu H L, Xue W , et al. A coupled experiment with LICOM2 as the ocean component of CESM1[J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2016,30(1):76-92
[33]	Laurent S L C, Simmons H L, Jayne S R . Estimating tidally driven mixing in the deep ocean[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2002,29(23). DOI: 10.1029/2002GL015633
[34]	Yu Z P, Liu H L, Lin P F . A numerical study of the influence of tidal mixing on Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) simulation[J]. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 2017,41(5):1087-1100. DOI: 10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1702.16263
[35]	Murray R J . Explicit generation of orthogonal grids for ocean models[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1996,126(2):251-273
[36]	Ferreira D, Marshall J, Heimbach P . Estimating eddy stresses by fitting dynamics to observations using a residual-mean ocean circulation model and its adjoint[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2004,35(10):1891-1910
[37]	Griffies S, Adcroft A, Aiki H , et al. Sampling physical ocean fields in WCRP CMIP5 simulations [R/OL]. Sampling physical ocean fields in WCRP CMIP5 simulations [R/OL]. 2010 [2019-01-16].
[38]	Suzuki T, Yamazaki D, Tsujino H , et al. A dataset of continental river discharge based on JRA-55 for use in a global ocean circulation model[J]. Journal of Oceanography, 2018,74(4):421-429
[39]	Sun Z K, Liu H L, Lin P F , et al. The modeling of the north equatorial countercurrent in the community Earth system model and its oceanic component[J]. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 2019. DOI: 10.1029/2018MS001521

CMIP6海洋模式比较计划（OMIP）概况与评述

Short commentary on CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP)

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价