Climate Change Research ›› 2022, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (6): 777-790.doi: 10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2021.257

• Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Assessment of economic, environmental and health benefits of the energy transition path—take the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area as an example

LIN Ze-Wei1,2,3, WANG Peng1,2(), REN Song-Yan1,2,3, XU Hong-Wei4, ZHANG Cong1,2,3,5, ZHAO Dai-Qing1,2   

  1. 1 Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
    2 Key laboratory of Renewable Energy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
    3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    4 Guangdong Provincial Academy of Environmental Science, Guangzhou 510045, China
    5 School of Engineering Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China
  • Received:2021-11-01 Revised:2021-12-21 Online:2022-11-30 Published:2022-02-18
  • Contact: WANG Peng E-mail:wangpeng@ms.giec.ac.cn

Abstract:

Energy transition is a key measure to promote the realization of the “Dual Carbon” goals. A comprehensive evaluation model was constructed for energy transition in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA). Then the baseline scenario, the transition scenario and the deep transition scenario were designed to evaluate the impact of energy transition on the economy industry, environmental positive externality, and health benefit of the GBA. The results are as follows. (1) The clean replacement of energy will promote the carbon emission peak time of the transition scenario and the deep transition scenario to 2025 and 2022, respectively, and the carbon emissions are reduced by 22.0% and 35.9% respectively, compared with the 2035 baseline scenario. Among them, the clean replacement of electricity contributes to a reduction of 59 million tons of carbon emissions, accounting for 53% of the entire society’s emissions reductions. (2) The transition and upgrading of industries and the optimization of investment structure will promote a GDP growth of 0.68% in the transition scenario compared with the 2035 baseline scenario. However, in the deep transition scenario, the carbon restrictions are too strict, resulting in a GDP loss of 0.34%. (3) The energy transition has positive externalities to the environment. Compared with the baseline scenario, SO2, NOX, PM2.5, PM10 will be reduced by 35%, 20%, 36% and 37%, respectively in the transition scenario in 2035, bringing CNY 15.56 billion of health benefit, accounting for about 0.05% of the GDP of the GBA. Comprehensively considering the economic, environmental, health impact of the energy transition on the GBA, the economy of transition scenario is the best, and it will bring 0.73% of economic benefit in 2035. The GBA should set a reasonable carbon emission reduction target, steadily promote the process of energy transition, and achieve the green energy transition and the coordinated development of energy, economy and environment.

Key words: Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA), Energy transition, CGE model, Economic impact, Health impact

京ICP备11008704号-4
Copyright © Climate Change Research, All Rights Reserved.
Tel: (010)58995171 E-mail: accr@cma.gov.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd