Introduction of CAMS-CSM model and its participation in CMIP6

doi:10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2019.186

Abstract

Abstract:

The Coupling Model Intercomparison Program organized by the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) has been advanced to CMIP6. The climate system model CAMS-CSM developed by the Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences is one of the registered models to participate in CMIP6. In addition to the Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima (DECK) expreiment and Historical simulation required by CMIP6, CAMS-CSM also plans to participate in four Model Intercomparison Projects (MIPs) such as Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP), Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP), Global Monsoons Model Intercomparison Project (GMMIP) and High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP). This paper provides a reference for model data users by introducing the basic configuration of CAMS-CSM model, its basic simulation performance, as well as the CMIP6 experiments and MIPs it plans to participate.

Key words: CAMS-CSM, CMIP6, Climate system model (CSM), Earth system model (ESM)

Xin-Yao RONG,Jian LI,Hao-Ming CHEN,Yu-Fei XIN,Jing-Zhi SU,Li-Juan HUA,Zheng-Qiu ZHANG. Introduction of CAMS-CSM model and its participation in CMIP6[J]. Climate Change Research, 2019, 15(5): 540-544.

Figures/Tables 2

References

[1]	Roeckner E, B?uml G, Bonaventura L , et al. The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5. Part I: model description [R/OL]. 2003 [2019-01-20].
[2]	Yu R C . A two-step shape-preserving advection scheme[J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 1994,11:479-490
[3]	张祎, 宇如聪, 李建 , 等. 两步保形平流方案在高分辨率球面经纬网格下的跳点差分试[J]. 气象学报, 2013,71(6):1089-1102.
[3]	Zhang Y, Yu R C, Li J . An implementation of a leaping-point two-step shape-preserving advection scheme in the high-resolution spherical latitude-longitude grid[J]. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 2013,71(6):1089-1102 (in Chinese)
[4]	Zhang H, Nakajima T, Shi G Y , et al. An optimal approach to overlapping bands with correlated k distribution method and its application to radiative calculations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2003,108(D20):464l
[5]	Zhang H, Shi G, Nakajima T , et al. The effects of the choice of the k-interval number on radiative calculations[J]. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2006,98:31-43
[6]	Zhang H, Suzuki T, Nakajima T , et al. Effects of band division on radiative calculations[J]. Optical Engineering, 2006,45(1):016002. DOI: 10.1117/1.2160521
[7]	Griffies S M, Harrison M J, Pacanowski P C , et al. A technical guide to MOM4. GFDL ocean group technical report NO. 5 [R]. NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, 2004: 339
[8]	Winton M . A reformulated three-layer sea ice model[J]. Journal of atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2000,17:525-531
[9]	Dai Y, Zeng X, Dickinson R E , et al. The common land model[J]. Bulletin American Meteorological Society, 2003,84:1013-1023
[10]	Niu G Y, Yang Z L . Effects of frozen soil on snowmelt runoff and soil water storage at a continental scale[J]. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 2006,7:937-952. DOI: 10.1175/JHM538.1
[11]	Xin Y F, Wu B Y, Bian L G , et al. Response of the East Asian climate system to water and heat changes of global frozen soil using NCAR CAM model[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2012,57:4462-4471. DOI: 10.1007/s11434-012-5361-2
[12]	Hagemann S, Dümenil L . A parametrization of the lateral waterflow for the global scale[J]. Climate Dynamics, 1998,14:17-31. DOI: 10.1007/s003820050205
[13]	Rong X Y, Li J, Chen H M , et al. The CAMS climate system model and a basic evaluation of its climatology and climate variability simulation[J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2018,32(6):839-861. DOI: 10.1007/s13351-018-8058-x
[14]	Eyring V, Bony S, Meehl G A , et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization[J]. Geoscientific Model Development, 2016,9:1937-1958. DOI: 10.5194/gmdd-8-10539-2015
[15]	Li J, Chen H, Rong X , et al. How well can a climate model simulate an extreme precipitation event: a case study using the transpose-AMIP experiment[J]. Journal of Climate, 2018,31(16):6543-6556
[16]	Chen X L, Guo Z, Zhou T J , et al. Climate sensitivity and feedbacks of a new coupled model CAMS-CSM to idealized CO2 forcing: a comparison with CMIP5 models[J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2019,33(1):31-45. DOI: 10.1007/s13351-019-8074-5
[17]	Qi Y J, Zhang R H, Rong X Y , et al. Boreal summer intraseasonal oscillation in the Asian-Pacific monsoon region simulated in CAMS-CSM[J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2019,33(1):66-79. DOI: 10.1007/s13351-019-8080-7
[18]	Ren P, Li G, Ren H , et al. Representation of the Madden-Julian Oscillation in CAMS-CSM[J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s13351-019-8118-x
[19]	Hua L J, Chen L, Rong X Y , et al. An assessment of ENSO stability in CAMS climate system model simulations[J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2019,33(1):80-88. DOI: 10.1007/s13351-018-8092-8
[20]	Lu B, Ren H L . ENSO features, dynamics, and teleconnections to East Asian climate as simulated in CAMS-CSM[J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2019,33(1):46-65. DOI: 10.1007/s13351-019-8101-6
[21]	Zhang G, Li J D, Rong X Y , et al. An assessment of CAMS-CSM in simulating land-atmosphere heat and water exchanges[J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2018,32(6):862-880. DOI: 10.1007/s13351-018-8055-0
[22]	Wei T, Li J, Rong X Y , et al. Arctic climate changes based on historical simulations (1900?2013) with the CAMS-CSM[J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2018,32(6):881-895. DOI: 10.1007/s13351-018-7188-5
[23]	Wang L, Zhou T, Li J , et al. Convectively coupled equatorial waves simulated by CAMS-CSM model[J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s13351-019-9021-1
[24]	Nan S, Yang J, Bao Y , et al. Simulation of the Northern and Southern Hemisphere annular modes by CAMS-CSM[J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s13351-019-8099-9