《巴黎协定》强化透明度体系的建立与实施展望

doi:10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2019.022

气候变化研究进展 ›› 2019, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6): 684-692.doi: 10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2019.022

《巴黎协定》强化透明度体系的建立与实施展望

王田¹,董亮²,高翔¹()

1 国家应对气候变化战略研究和国际合作中心,北京 100038
2 外交学院亚洲研究所,北京 100037

收稿日期:2019-01-23 修回日期:2019-03-10 出版日期:2019-11-30 发布日期:2019-11-30
通讯作者: 高翔 E-mail:gaoxiang@ncsc.org.cn
作者简介:王田,女,助理研究员,wangtian@ncsc.org.cn
基金资助:
资助项目：科学技术部第四次气候变化国家评估报告——减缓气候变化;教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(15JZD035)

Establishment and implementation prospects of the enhanced transparency system under the Paris Agreement

Tian WANG¹,Liang DONG²,Xiang GAO¹()

1 National Center for Climate Change Strategy and International Cooperation, Beijing 100038, China
2 Institute of Asian Studies, China Foreign Affairs University, Beijing 100037, China

Received:2019-01-23 Revised:2019-03-10 Online:2019-11-30 Published:2019-11-30
Contact: Xiang GAO E-mail:gaoxiang@ncsc.org.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以信息报告和审评为主要内容的透明度体系是《巴黎协定》有效实施的重要保障。《巴黎协定》建立了“强化的透明度框架”,并在2018年底达成了实施细则,形成了强化的透明度体系。这一体系建立在既往透明度履约实践基础上,针对缔约方在《巴黎协定》下所承担“共同但有区别”的义务,在为发展中国家提供履约灵活性和支持的情况下,遵循通用的模式、程序和指南。该规则体系有利于提高缔约方履约报告质量和可比性,督促各方履行条约义务,增进全球气候治理多边机制互信。然而这一体系相比既往实践,给发展中国家提出强化要求的同时尚未落实强化的支持,且体系本身的运行效率还有待观察。为此,各国应当做好充分的国内体制机制建设准备,国际社会应当落实对发展中国家履约的支持,强化相应能力建设。

关键词: 气候变化, 巴黎协定, 透明度, 国际机制, 实施细则

Abstract:

The transparency system, which mainly includes reporting and review of information submitted by Parties, is an important guarantee for the effective implementation of the Paris Agreement. The Paris Agreement established the enhanced transparency framework and adopted the implementation rules at the end of 2018, forming an enhanced transparency system. Building on existing transparency experiences and practices, this system applies common modalities, procedures, and guidelines while providing flexibility and support to developing countries to enhance transparency, reflecting common but differentiated obligation by Parties under the Paris Agreement. The system is conducive to improving the quality and comparability of Parties’ national reports, urging all Parties to fulfill their obligations and enhancing mutual trust in the multilateral mechanisms of global climate governance. However, compared with the current practice, this system has imposed a strong burden on developing countries while not strengthening respective support, and the overall operational efficiency of the system itself remains to be seen. To this end, countries should prepare for domestic institutional mechanisms, and the international community should continue to support developing countries for their compliance and strengthen their corresponding capacity building.

Key words: Climate change, Paris Agreement, Transparency, International regime, Implementation rule

王田,董亮,高翔. 《巴黎协定》强化透明度体系的建立与实施展望[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2019, 15(6): 684-692.

Tian WANG,Liang DONG,Xiang GAO. Establishment and implementation prospects of the enhanced transparency system under the Paris Agreement[J]. Climate Change Research, 2019, 15(6): 684-692.

图/表 1

参考文献

[1]	Gupta A . Transparency in global environmental governance: a coming of age?[J]. Global Environmental Politics, 2010,10(3):1-9
[2]	罗伯特·基欧汉, 约瑟夫·奈 . 权力与相互依赖 [M].4版.门洪华译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2012: 246-247.
[2]	Keohane R O, Nye J S. Power and interdependence: world politics in transition [M]. 4th ed. Boston: Longman, 2012 (in Chinese)
[3]	Axelrod R, Keohane R . Achieving cooperation under anarchy: strategies and institutions[J]. World Politics, 1985,38(1):226-254
[4]	Ausubel J, Victor D G . Verification of international environmental agreements[J]. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 1992,17(1):2-3
[5]	Greene O . International environmental regimes: verification and implementation review[J]. Environmental Politics, 1993,2(4):156-173
[6]	Grant R, Keohane R . Accountability and abuses of power in world politics[J]. American Political Science Review, 2005,99(1):41-42
[7]	Mitchell R B . Transparency for governance: the mechanisms and effectiveness of disclosure-based and education-based transparency policies[J]. Ecological Economics, 2011,70(11):1882-1890
[8]	Abbott K W . Trust but verify: the production of information in arms controls treaties and other international agreements[J]. Cornell International Law Journal, 1993,26(1):1-58
[9]	U.S. Department of State. Outcome of the 24th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP24) to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) [EB/OL]. 2018 [2019-01-19]. https://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2018/12/288121.htm
[10]	European Commission. UN climate talks: EU plays instrumental role in making the Paris Agreement operational [EB/OL]. 2018 [2019-01-19]. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/news/un-climate-talks-eu-plays-instrumental-role-making-paris-agreement-operational_en
[11]	傅莎, 邹骥, 张晓华 , 等. IPCC第五次评估报告历史排放趋势和未来减缓情景相关核心结论解读分析[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2014,10(5):323-330.
[11]	Fu S, Zou J, Zhang X H , et al. Analysis on the key findings related to historical emission trends and future mitigation scenarios from the working group III contribution to the IPCC Fifth assessment report[J]. Progressus Inquisitiones de Mutatione Climatis, 2014,10(5):323-330 (in Chinese)
[12]	高翔 . 《巴黎协定》与国际减缓气候变化合作模式的变迁[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2016,12(2):83-91.
[12]	Gao X . Paris Agreement and the transformation of international climate mitigation cooperation[J]. Climate Change Research, 2016,12(2):83-91 (in Chinese)
[13]	Voigt C . The compliance and implementation mechanism of the Paris Agreement[J]. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 2016,25(2):161-173
[14]	秦天宝 . 论《巴黎协定》中“自下而上”机制及启示[J]. 国际法研究, 2016 ( 3):64-76.
[14]	Qin T B . The “bottom-up” approach in the Paris Agreement and its enlightenment[J]. Chinese Review of International Law, 2016 ( 3):64-76 (in Chinese)
[15]	Kong X W . Achieving accountability in climate negotiations: past practices and implications for the post-2020 agreement[J]. Chinese Journal of International Law, 2015,14(3):545-565
[16]	Bodansky D . The legal character of the Paris Agreement[J]. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 2016,25(2):142-150
[17]	Winkler H, Mantlana B, Letete T . Transparency of action and support in the Paris Agreement[J]. Climate Policy, 2017,17(7):853-872
[18]	董亮 . 透明度原则的制度化及其影响: 以全球气候治理为例[J]. 外交评论, 2018 ( 4):106-131.
[18]	Dong L . Institutionalizing the principle of transparency and its implications: in case of global climate governance[J]. Foreign Affairs Review, 2018 ( 4):106-131 (in Chinese)
[19]	Wang T, Gao X . Reflection and operationalization of the “Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities” principle in the transparency framework under the international climate change regime[J]. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2018,9(4):253-263
[20]	Commonwealth of Australia. National inventory report 2015 [EB/OL]. 2017 [2019-01-19]. https://unfccc.int/process/transparency-andreporting/reporting-and-review-under-the-convention/greenhouse-gasinventories/submissions-of-annual-greenhouse-gas-inventories-for-2017
[21]	UNFCCC. Biennial update report submissions from non-Annex I Parties [EB/OL]. 2019 [2019-01-19]. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/transparency-and-reporting/reporting-and-review-under-the-convention/national-communications-and-biennial-update-reports-non-annex-i-parties/biennial-update-report-submissions-from-non-annex-i-parties
[22]	Global Environment Facility. Progress report of the capacity-building initiative for transparency GEF/C.55/Inf.12 [EB/OL]. 2018 [ 2019- 01- 19]. http://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/documents/EN_GEF.C.55.Inf_.12_CBIT.pdf
[23]	UNFCCC. Information provided by the global environment facility on its activities relating to the preparation of national communications and biennial update reports. FCCC/SBI/2017/INF.10 [EB/OL]. 2017 [2019-01-19]. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/docs/2017/sbi/eng/inf10.pdf
[24]	The People’s Republic of China. Third national communication on climate change [R/OL]. 2019 [2019-08-10]. https://unfccc.int/documents/197660
[25]	The People’s Republic of China. Second biennial update report on climate change [R/OL]. 2019 [2019-08-10]. https://unfccc.int/documents/197666
[26]	朱松丽, 蔡博峰, 朱建华 , 等. IPCC国家温室气体清单指南精细化的主要内容和启示[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2018,14(1):86-94.
[26]	Zhu S L, Cai B F, Zhu J H , et al. The main content and insights of 2019 refinements to IPCC 2006 guidelines[J]. Climate Change Research, 2018,14(1):86-94 (in Chinese)

《巴黎协定》强化透明度体系的建立与实施展望

Establishment and implementation prospects of the enhanced transparency system under the Paris Agreement

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	史培军,杨文涛. 山区孕灾环境下地震和极端天气气候对地质灾害的影响[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(4): 405-414.
[2]	徐粒,李倩,王瑛,黄靖玲,许映军. 气候变化情景下泥石流危险性响应分析[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(4): 415-423.
[3]	王天鹏,滕飞. 可计算一般均衡框架下的气候变化经济影响综合评估[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(4): 480-490.
[4]	李柔珂,韩振宇,徐影,石英,吴佳. 高分辨率区域气候变化降尺度数据对京津冀地区高温GDP和人口暴露度的集合预估[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(4): 491-504.
[5]	袁媛,李国庆. 日本多主体适应气候变化框架机制及对中国的启示——基于法律政策的视角[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(4): 505-515.
[6]	田丹宇,郑文茹. 国外应对气候变化的立法进展与启示[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(4): 526-534.
[7]	张奇谋,王润,姜彤,陈松生. RCPs情景下汉江流域未来极端降水的模拟与预估[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(3): 276-286.
[8]	黄鹤楼,邹旭恺,丁烨毅,陈鲜艳,石英,肖风劲. 气候变化对宁波四明山人体舒适度的影响[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(3): 316-324.
[9]	张小全, 谢茜, 曾楠. 基于自然的气候变化解决方案[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(3): 336-344.
[10]	樊星,王际杰,王田,高翔. 马德里气候大会盘点及全球气候治理展望[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(3): 367-372.
[11]	王朋岭,黄磊,巢清尘,袁佳双,陈超. IPCC SROCC的主要结论和启示[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(2): 133-142.
[12]	成里京. SROCC：海洋热含量变化评估[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(2): 172-181.
[13]	蔡榕硕,韩志强,杨正先. 海洋的变化及其对生态系统和人类社会的影响、风险及应对[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(2): 182-193.
[14]	翁宇威,蔡闻佳,王灿. 共享社会经济路径（SSPs）的应用与展望[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(2): 215-222.
[15]	柴麒敏,傅莎,祁悦,樊星. 《巴黎协定》实施细则评估与全球气候治理展望[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2020, 16(2): 232-242.