| [1] | IPCC. Special report on global warming of 1.5℃ [M]. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2018 | | [2] | Zickfeld K, MacDougall A H, Matthews H D . On the proportionality between global temperature change and cumulative CO2 emissions during periods of net negative CO2 emissions[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2016,11(5). DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/055006 | | [3] | Xu Y Y, Ramanathan V . Well below 2℃: mitigation strategies for avoiding dangerous to catastrophic climate changes[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017,114(39):10315-10323. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1618481114 | | [4] | Xiao X J, Jiang K J . China’s nuclear power under the global 1.5℃target: preliminary feasibility study and prospects[J]. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2018,9(2):138-143 | | [5] | Vrontisi Z, Luderer G, Saveyn B , et al. Enhancing global climate policy ambition towards a 1.5℃ stabilization: a short-term multi-model assessment[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2018,13(4):044039 | | [6] | van Vuuren D P, Stehfest E, David E H J, #magtechI# et al. Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2018,8(5):391-397 | | [7] | van Vuuren D P, Kok M, Lucas P L , et al. Pathways to achieve a set of ambitious global sustainability objectives by 2050: explorations using the IMAGE integrated assessment model[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2015,98:303-323 | | [8] | van Vuuren D P, Hof A F, van Sluisveld M A E, et al. Open discussion of negative emissions is urgently needed[J]. Nature Energy, 2017,2(12):902-904 | | [9] | Tokarska K B, Gillett N P, Arora V K , et al. The influence of non-CO2 forcings on cumulative carbon emissions budgets[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2018,13(3):034039. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaafdd | | [10] | Rogelj J, Popp A, Calvin K V , et al. Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 ℃[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2018,8(4):325-332 | | [11] | NASEM. Valuing climate damages: updating estimation of the social costs of carbon dioxide [M]. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Washington DC, USA: the National Academies Press, 2017 | | [12] | Minx J C, Lamb W F, Callaghan M W , et al. Fast growing research on negative emissions[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2017,12(3). DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa5ee5 | | [13] | Mehling M, Tvinnereim E . Carbon pricing and the 1.5℃ target: near-term decarbonisation and the importance of an instrument mix[J]. Carbon & Climate Law Review, 2018,12(1):50-61 | | [14] | Riahi K, van Vuuren D P, Kriegler E , et al. The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2016,42:153-168 | | [15] | Kriegler E, Luderer G, Bauer N , et al. Pathways limiting warming to 1.5℃: a tale of turning around in no time?[J]. Philosophical Transactions, 2018,376(2119):20160457 | | [16] | Shi Y Y, Sun J, Wu L X . Analysis on the synergistic effect of sustainable development of coal industry under 1.5°C scenario[J]. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2018,9(2):130-137 | | [17] | Jiang K J, He C M, Dai H C , et al. Emission scenario analysis for China under the global 1.5℃ target [J/OL]. Carbon Management, 2018, . 2018. 1477835 | | [18] | Jiang K J . 1.5℃ target: not a hopeless imagination[J]. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2018,9(2):93-94 | | [19] | IPCC. Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change [M]. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014 |
|
